Dear Mr. Khan, I am unable to understand your comments. Would you kindly write a bit clearly what you want tomean by your second and third line? Politics is the only replacement of politics. That's ok. Then how do you find this poll inconsistent with that idea? Did you read my note to the poll?

According the existing law/ ruel of constitution, the CTG is formed with people selected by one man. This man is determined ex-officio from a particular profession without any consideration to his/her political relationship. Therefore, it is very likely that this person could be a partisan person leading all other members of the CTG selected by him being politically biased making the CTG's desired neutrality questionable to other parties and general people. As a consequence of this weakness of the constitution, we had to face 1/11. The poll is to collect the opinio of people toward a change that the CTG would be formed with non-partisan members nominated by all political parties/ both political alliances or you can say bi-partisan support. That means with people who will be supported by both political alliances. I don't see how this goes against politics. If something like this is implemented that would help us reduce political clashes within the country and offer a fair-play political environment.

Of course we want politics back to politicians, but obviously we do not want another 15 February, august 28 or another 1/11.

In the proposed (changed) method/system:

1. Each political alliances/ parties will independently choose their preferred members from a pool of non-partisan people coming from all professions/ stratus of the society.
2. Only the members chosen/ nominated by both the alliances will form the CTG.

Is it not better than what we have now? Now, the chief advisor can select his wife, son, all in-laws or whoever he/ she wants. That's why we have seen so many unfit people in CTGs before.

I can see people in this board are busy commenting on past events and who is what. Contrary to that this poll was designed to form an opinion on idea of what we want in future to bring political stability in the country avoiding political clashes between parties. I don't see how that can be considered bad.

We only need the agreement of the parties to the change. The alliances/ parties do not need to sit together to nominate the non-partisan members. That they will be able to select independently of their own without discussing with the opponents. How? We can discuss that later, if required.